<< Back to CCN Newsletter - Winter 2007

CCN Survey Results: Mobility Device Usage

In October, CCN members who identified themselves as having a mobility related disability were invited to participate in a survey that tried to identify how mobility devices are acquired and used by members. A total of 63 members responded.

The survey found that more than 80% of survey participants own two or more mobility devices. Of these participants, a majority of device owners said that they are pleased with their devices (90% reported being satisfied with their primary devices and 80% reported satisfied with their secondary devices). The survey also found that primary and secondary mobility devices are used more often away from home than in the home.

The needs of the user are important considerations in the design and provision of mobility devices. If a device is abandoned or replaced, it could indicate that the device is not able to meet the needs for which it was intended. The survey indicated that many owners of newer devices still use their older devices regularly. About half of people who own secondary devices use them at least once per week. However, 40% of respondents said that they own but do not use a secondary device at all and nearly half of respondents reported that they own at least one device that is not used at all.

There are many reasons why a device might be replaced. Most often, respondents claimed that they no longer used a device because they now use a newer one. Other reasons implied the need for better design. Designs that are easier to use, more adjustable/provide a better fit or more reliable/break less may help to decrease the need to replace devices.

Graph of 'who paid for mobility device' see graph 1 long description

Graph 1. Long Description (new window)

No device is expected to last forever. However, replacing a device before it is expected to wear out can impose a huge financial burden on the user. Devices are paid for through a variety of means. Most often, users pay for their devices with their own funds and with the help of insurance of Medicare/Medicaid. The percentage of people who paid for secondary devices out of pocket and with insurance seemed to increase slightly as well as the need for other sources of funding over the primary device. This can translate into higher costs to users not only when the device is purchased but also potentially in increased cost of insurance.

Graph of 'reason device is no longer used' see graph 2 long description

Graph 2. Long Description (new window)

We would like to thank everyone who participated in this survey. The information in it will be used to guide further inquiry into improving mobility equipment and funding.

Contact

Young Mi Choi
Graduate Research Assistant
christina.choi@gatech.edu